Power Sources
Basic Carbon-free energy sources
Renewable energy sources:
We need some other way of producing electricity in a completely carbon-free way; this needs to be highly responsive to changes in demand in order to even out the fluctuations in electricity produced from Solar and Wind.
Solar thermal only works in hot countries,
BECCS (Bio Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage) is yet another burden on fertile, potentially food-productive land,
Fusion is still a long way off in terms of technology,
and there are problems with conventional Nuclear power stations.
I believe a good solution would be to use Molten Salt Thermal Generators.
More detailed discussion
How can we (i.e. the whole world) become Carbon Free?
Is it possible?
Policies that require people to forego travel, or consumer electronics, or insisting that everyone must become vegetarian … these policies might be well intentioned – but in the free world, they are simply unrealistic demands.
Demanding that the developing world never “develops” as much as the West already has, would be basically unfair and would not be agreed by those “developing” countries. As a result there would be no global agreement.
In terms of energy, we have spent the last couple of hundred years developing – enabling the planet to support more and more people, in more and more comfort. However, the vast majority of the energy to enable that change has been generated by converting carbon to carbon-dioxide. We now need to repair the damage that has done by converting the excess CO2 back into carbon. That will take a lot more energy than the energy produced by burning the carbon in the first place. We need to do that as well as producing all the energy required to continue the development.
It is a huge problem.
We hear a lot about renewables “powering a number of homes”, when actually what the proponents mean is that the electricity supply to those homes has been provided by wind, wave or solar-generated electricity.
However, this is misleading as the energy used by each of us is far more than the just the electricity used by our houses. Our energy use includes:
- the energy used to heat our homes
- the energy used to produce the food we eat
- the energy used to manufacture the items we use (TVs, Microwaves, washing machines, crockery, cutlery, cars, bicycles, furniture, clothes, shoes, pillows, duvets)
- the energy used to make the concrete, bricks, tiles, pipes, steel and glass to build our homes
- the energy used to transport all the food & items we use to the shops
- the energy used to build the roads & railways on which we travel and which allow the delivery of all the items we use
- the energy used to make the wires and pipes which bring electricity and water to our homes
- the energy used to pump the water in the water-supply systems
- the energy used to pump and process the sewage we produce
- the energy used to take away our waste
- the energy used to recycle and sort our recyclables
The list is almost endless, and that is just looking at what humans need.
We need sufficient surplus energy to be able to care for all the other inhabitants of this wonderful planet and to restore what we have already damaged. In other words, producing the energy we need must not put too much stress on the planet.
Switching off your lights when you are not in a given room is useful, but it will never ever solve this problem, or make much of a dent in it.
Going vegan might help a bit, but it is not going to solve the problem. Indeed, if instead of eating locally grown vegetables, we end up transporting in nuts that have taken vast amounts of artesian water to grow in California, or avocados, or soya beans which have been grown on areas which were once rain-forest, then it really might not help at all. Drinking almond-milk has a much higher carbon footprint than drinking locally produced cow’s milk.
We do need to look at the entire cycle of everything to work out what is good and what is bad in terms of energy usage and carbon production.
It is easier to think in terms of energy, and we need energy on an industrial scale, not just enough “electricity” to turn the lights on in our homes.
So – looking at renewable energy, if we do a full cycle analysis, electricity from both solar PV and Wind is basically good, but it is very variable. Sadly, solar electricity is not usually produced at the times when there is the highest demand for electricity.
Wind power is variable – sometimes the wind blows & sometimes it does not.
At the moment, in order to smooth out the supply and demand, we typically use gas-fired generators, burning “natural gas” i.e. methane, a carbon fossil fuel, to produce electricity when there is not enough being generated by Wind and Solar.
Because we do not currently store industrial quantities of electricity, we actually switch off wind turbines when there is more electricity being produced than is needed at a given time.
Both these are crazy – gas-fired turbines produce CO2 – so are definitely not Carbon-Free. Some designs could try to capture the CO2, but this dramatically reduces their efficiency.
Switching off Wind turbines because the electricity is not needed at that moment, when it would be needed later, is really sad.
So – we need some way of storing power-station amounts of electricity at least over the span of a day, in order to be able to use all the potential wind and solar power.
If we could store all the electricity produced from renewables, including Hydro-electric and Wave power – would that be enough?
Unfortunately, though it would be a big improvement, the answer is no (see Sustainable Energy without the hot air)
Electricity generating mix for various countries
Energy and electricity usage in 2020 was lower than usual because of Covid-19 – a UK government estimate indicates 4.7% down from 2019 values.
France electricty 500 TWh in 2020
7.5% carbon fossil fuels (mostly natural gas)
67.1% nuclear power
13% hydroelectricity
7.9% from wind
2.5% solar PV
2.0% biomass
UK electricty generated 313 TWh, used 342 TWh in 2020
36.1% carbon fossil fuels (coal 1.6%, natural gas 34.5%)
24.8% wind
17.2% nuclear power
4.4% solar PV
1.6% hydroelectricity
6.5% biomass
0.5% storage
8.4% imports (from Europe via connections to France and the Netherlands)
Germany electricty 483.5 TWh in 2020
36.5% carbon fossil fuels (coal 24.3%, natural gas 12.2%)
27.2% wind
12.6% nuclear power
10.5% solar PV
9.4% biomass
3.8% hydroelectricity
USA electricty 4056.3 TWh in 2020
Fossil fuels 59.65% (coal 19.1% oil 0.45% gas 40.1%)
nuclear 19.5%
wind 8.32%
hydro 7.2%
solar 2.25%
wood 0.9%
bio(other) 0.5%
geo thermal 0.4%
misc 1.3%
References / external websites:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lectricit%C3%A9_en_France#Moyens_de_production
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_the_United_Kingdom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_of_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_grid_of_Continental_Europe