Molten Salt Thermal Generators
Overview
There are a number of competing designs for these, but essentially they use Thorium as a fuel, and generate loads of heat, so much so that they are typically cooled using molten salts. Molten salt is a mixture of chemicals much like table salt, heated to the point of melting.
Molten Salt generators use these low-pressure, high-temperature molten salts to circulate around a heat source and to carry that heat away to wherever it is needed – ideally some industrial process to use up some of the energy at the very high temperature, but, at lower temperatures, to produce electricity from conventional steam turbines.
By contrast, similar temperature systems that use water cooling require very high pressures. The famous nuclear PWRs – that is pressurised water reactors – typically run at pressures of around 150 atmospheres. This makes them very big, very expensive, and very difficult to prevent them leaking. Worse still if the system leaks, or a pump fails, or the water doesn’t flow adequately, the water can boil, and physically blow up the building.
Molten salts do not need any additional pressure at all, and they don’t boil at the temperature that could be reached in a thorium Molten Salt Generator. In fact, Molten Salt Generators are typically described as “walk-away safe” – which means that if all the staff went on strike, or simply walked away, or if the pumps, and fans and machinery all failed simultaneously, the system would not explode, but rather it would simply shut down, all on its own. Here the physics is working for us, not against us.
Bizarrely, thorium is as common as mud. In fact it is found in mud, and rock. On earth, it is more abundant than tin and slightly less abundant than lead. For the sake of complete disclosure, thorium is very slightly radioactive, with a half-life of 14 billion years, or about the age of the universe. It decays so very slowly, and its atoms change so rarely, that it does not really count as radioactive. Granite kitchen worktops are more radioactive than thorium. All bananas contain potassium-40 which is 10 times more radioactive than thorium. Thorium poses no danger to human life, yet the heat released from thorium in the earth’s core, is thought to be the largest factor in keeping planet earth with a liquid core. Planet earth has been benefiting from heat from thorium for the last 4 billion years or so.
Moreover, unlike typical uranium-based nuclear power plants, which, because of the way Physics works, inevitably create a lot of long-lived nuclear waste, which needs to be stored for thousands of years, thorium-based Molten Salt Generators do not produce long lasting waste. In fact, some parts of the “waste” generated through the process are highly valuable and safe medical isotopes.
The high temperatures at which MSGs operate are exactly what is required for many industrial and chemical processes and can be used directly to produce carbon-free hydrogen, or indeed just to produce electricity, as and when required.
The high temperature processes could include high-temperature electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen (SOEC), or the Sulphur-Iodine catalytic cycle to produce hydrogen from water, fertiliser production, aluminium smelting, iron and steel production, cement manufacture, etc.
If they are such a good idea, why are they not already in use?
An experimental prototype thorium-based Molten Salt Generator was built and operated successfully in the USA in the 1960s, shortly after the Americans had started to build uranium-based, water-cooled reactors. It was designed to be a potential aircraft engine.
The funding for new power plants at that stage was largely driven by the military, and thorium Molten-Salt Generators did not produce anything which the military could use for weapons, so the whole program was summarily shut down.
When starting any new technology, a large amount of up-front funding is required. To build a new power plant, you need to design it, build it and run it before there is any return on the investment.
There appear to be somewhat confused regulatory problems with thorium-based Molten Salt generators. Although thorium is not a controlled substance at all, the internal workings of the Molten Salt Generator are similar to what happens inside a uranium nuclear reactor, so any plant has to be approved by Atomic Energy Authorities. However it is also completely different: the output is orders of magnitude less dangerous; the radiation risk is hardly any worse than the radiation risk from an old coal-fired power station. The plant does not fit neatly into any of the regulatory boxes, so everyone stalls and no one knows what to do.
Because of this, many of the companies hoping to produce these generators are finding they can get permission to build similar plants which burn up nuclear waste, a far worse material to handle, but have not got permission to build a thorium-based plant.
It really is totally nonsensical.
Current state of technology
There are a few companies world-wide hoping to get their particular design of this generator to the point of having its first operational plant in place.
The heat source, eventually envisaged by most people, would be thorium, but initially many of the designs are proposing to use the spent nuclear waste from the conventional nuclear plants we have had in operation for the past few decades. The reason these generators can make use of this hazardous waste, is that the fuel is also made into a liquid molten salt.
The waste fuel rods from old nuclear power plants have typically used up only about 4% of the active material which could produce heat, because, in addition to generating massive heat initially, they also produce chemicals which slow down the very same fission process which produces the heat. After a few years, as these chemicals build up in the solid fuel, it will no longer be hot enough to contribute to a conventional nuclear plant. Instead, it just sits there being a radiation hazard for several thousand years, which really is a bad plan. However, if you re-process the old spent fuel rods, it is possible to separate out the material which will decay and continue to produce heat for years, as part of the molten salt fuel, until it is properly burnt up. In addition, it should be possible to extract some of the by-products from the molten salt fuel. Some of these by-products are very valuable in medicine, yet are considered an inconvenient contaminant for heat production.
Some of the companies are proposing to make initial plants to use uranium as the heat source, mostly because regulatory authorities and insurance companies recognise uranium and will authorise and insure its use, whereas they have not had previous experience of thorium, even though thorium would be a far safer option.
The companies working on these generators
Thorcon power
First operational plant should be deployed in Indonesia before 2027, using thorium.
Moltex energy
Moltex is a UK company. It should have its first plant operational in Canada “by the early 2030s”. They are planning three different designs, first a nuclear waste burner, second a uranium burner, third a thorium burner. Moltex Energy have been trying to promote this type of Molten Salt plant in the UK for several years.
Transatomic
Hoping to have a plant demonstrable in about three years time
Terrestrial energy
Hoping to have their first operational plant in place later this decade
Flibe energy
Hoping to produce a plant to use thorium or existing nuclear waste, but no indication of when.
Seaborg
Hoping to produce a uranium burner first, then a nuclear waste burner – still under development and no indication of dates
History of Molten Salt thermal generators
Back in the 1960s, Alvin Weinberg, the same person who designed the water-cooled nuclear reactors, went on to design a better form of generator. It was fail-safe, could never blow up and did not produce plutonium as a by-product. It did not breed its fuel very quickly, it produced a very small quantity of relatively short half-life “waste” products, many of which are useful/needed in modern medicine.
These generators were designed to be a potential aircraft engine, as they were small-scale, powerful, and safe. They did not produce anything which could be made into weapons.
The designer pleaded with the US government at the time to take up this new, better design, but the military did not like it as it didn’t give them the plutonium they required, and the US government had already promised jobs to people to build the first, worse design. The new design would provide jobs in a less politically useful part of the USA, so the design was not used and its designer was ultimately asked to retire.
In a three-year trial, in Oak Ridge, USA, a 3 MegaWatt (MW) generator produced a continuous supply of electricity, and ultimately contained 0.05% more active fuel than had been put into it at the outset. It ran safely.
The design:
The design is called the Molten Salt generator. This runs at a very high temperature, but low/normal pressure, unlike many industrial plants which run at high pressures and have a tendency to blow up. The “fuel”, mostly thorium, which keeps it hot, is dissolved in a eutectic mixture of molten salts (much like table salt/sodium chloride), specifically, lithium fluoride (LiF) and beryllium fluoride (BeF2). The mixture of these salts melts at about 460oC, but does not boil until 1430oC. The reactions only stay hot if the fuel in the salt is all close together in a lump – like a football.
Variable Electricity Production:
Because the fuel which produces heat is liquid, it can be circulated around heat-exchangers. In modern designs, the Molten salt containing the thorium and the Molten salt carrying the heat away to other processes would be two separate bodies of molten salt running past each other in heat-exchangers. The heat could be used directly for some chemical processes, eg Aluminium smelting, making concrete or steel, making ammonia (for nitrogenous fertilisers), or catalytic conversion of water to hydrogen and oxygen. You could have heat extracted at different temperature ranges, with one of the lower temperature ranges boiling water to steam to run steam turbines producing electricity and possibly the lowest, waste-heat cycle after that, being used directly to supply domestic hot water to buildings in the vicinity. By directing the circulating molten salt to different places, you could vary the amount of electricity produced, simultaneously varying the heat going into whatever other processes are being run by the system.
Fail-safe:
To keep it safe, the vessel design has an actively cooled “plug” at the bottom. If the temperature becomes too hot, or if there is a power loss or any problem, the plug will melt and all the liquid salt containing the fuel will run out into a wide flat area so that rather than being “football” shaped it would resemble a sheet of aluminium foil. In this form, the salt cools quickly and is too spread out for any reaction to continue; this will happen long before there is any possibility of the salt “boiling” and producing any gas.
Relatively small:
The 3 MW Oak Ridge reactor was only a few metres in all dimensions.
The neutrons, if thorium is used as a fuel, are not very high-energy, so the system would not need massive amounts of concrete shielding. After all, the original design was for an aircraft engine. The thorium versions are basically a chemical plant.
Catalytic production of Hydrogen:
The high temperature at which the reaction continues is high enough to run the Sulphur-Iodine chemical catalytic separation of water into oxygen & hydrogen. Hydrogen could be reacted with CO2 from the atmosphere to produce di-methyl-ether (DME) which could be used a liquid fuel or just stored for carbon capture. Di-methyl-ether has similar properties to ethanol for fuel. Certainly, if the Molten salt plant was being used as a heat source in the production of cement, (a process which produces large quantities of CO2 in high concentrations) then capturing that CO2 immediately by reacting it with hydrogen would be sensible.
Using up nuclear waste:
It is possible to use the same design to use up the nuclear waste we have from the various old nuclear plants. Indeed, these designs of Molten Salt Generators are likely to be the ones which are built first because of the current regulatory tangles over thorium. The nuclear waste burning ones would need the amount of concrete shielding one would expect for a plant handling nuclear waste, but at least they would use up that waste.
In existing nuclear plants the fuel remains solid and, because of this, chemicals which stop the cycle from progressing, build up in the fuel until it no longer generates enough heat to be useful in a power station. It is estimated at that point only about 3% of the fuel in those solid fuel lumps or rods has been used. We could also use the same design to burn up any dismantled nuclear weapons – which would be the modern day equivalent of turning swords into ploughshares and spears into pruning hooks.
Problems:
Political will – the original Molten Salt Generator was call a Molten Salt Reactor, and the word “reactor” is not popular, as people associate it with things nuclear, and anything nuclear with nuclear bombs and accidents from the old water-cooled reactors. However, it is worth remembering that even fire was used as a weapon when it was first discovered. Now we have learned how to control it, everybody is happy with using it in their kitchens! The problem with water-cooled nuclear reactors has always been that they are high-pressure systems. They had to maintain incredibly high pressures to stop the water from boiling. The danger was overheating, or failures in the seals causing the water to boil, or pumps failing, and thus causing things to rupture.
Ultimately, the fuel to be used in Molten Salt Generators would be thorium, which is cheap, and has. historically, been regarded as a waste-product in mining. Thorium is not radioactive itself, but will ultimately fission if hit by a neutron. There are not yet regulatory rules about using it and the risk-averse nature of government drags its feet on authorising any trials, so there are no “safety certificates” for this design of plant.
Research has been carried out on the effect of prolonged exposure to Molten salts and neutrons for the materials which will be used to make the reaction vessels.
We are in the bizarre position that it is easier to get certification for a molten salt generator which uses up the waste products from existing nuclear plants to provide the self-heating for the molten salt, than to get certification for the intrinsically better thorium-based design.
There is enough energy in thorium and existing waste from old nuclear plants to continue to power the planet for several thousands of years.
There are several groups looking at different designs of these plants, but all have struggled to persuade their governments to allow them to build one. It would appear that this political blockage might be starting to relax a little, and some should be built in the next few years, but it is taking far too long.
References / external websites:
SOEC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_oxide_electrolyzer_cell
Sulphur-iodine catalycic cycle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur%E2%80%93iodine_cycle
Thorcon power
https://thorconpower.com/
Moltex energy
https://www.moltexenergy.com/
http://www.energyprocessdevelopments.com/learn-more.html
Transatomic
http://www.transatomicpower.com/
Terrestrial energy
https://www.terrestrialenergy.com/
Flibe energy
https://flibe-energy.com/
Seaborg
https://www.seaborg.co/
Eutectic mixture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutectic_system
FLiBe salt properties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLiBe
1960s Original Molten Salt Reactor
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.13182/NT8-2-118
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.13182/NSE90-374
Preparation & handling of salt mixtures
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4074869
Stability Analysis of the MSR